Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
To evaluate the publication and quality of reporting of abstracts of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences.
Although there are many texts on the quality of epidemiological studies, little effort has been made to evaluate the publication of epidemiological studies and their results (the articles).
To evaluate the publication rate of scientific abstracts orally presented at the annual meeting of the French Society of Radiology (FSR), and to identify factors associated with publication.
Egger's regression analysis was used to evaluate the publication bias.
We therefore did not evaluate the publication bias using the traditional method.
Begg's 20 and Egger's tests 21 will be used to evaluate the publication bias.
Similar(41)
Furthermore, another metric was used to evaluate the publications based on the title which is known as KeyWords Plus.
In this study, we evaluated the publication speed of ophthalmology journals.
We evaluated the publication bias.
We evaluated the publication bias using the tests described by Begg and Egger.
We evaluated the publication bias by using the Egger's test and Begger's test, resulting in P > 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com