Sentence examples for evaluate the laboratory performance from inspiring English sources
This study aims to evaluate the laboratory performance of warm mix asphalt containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (WMA RAP) materials.
Marshall stability, moisture susceptibility, indirect tensile resilient modulus and dynamic creep tests were used to evaluate the laboratory performance of the mixtures.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the laboratory cracking-resistance and fracture performance of different geosynthetic interlayer materials embedded in HMA samples.
Mr. Skinner said the disease control agency was evaluating the laboratory to make sure no one else was infected.
The assay design includes lyophylized recombinant proteins as calibrators, run-validation control samples (calibrators added to a phosphate-buffered solution), as well as a qualification panel to evaluate the analytical performance(s) in the laboratory.
This paper presents a study in which the engineering properties of asphalt binder containing waste engine oil residues were evaluated through laboratory performance testing.
The objective of this study was to design and evaluate the performance of a laboratory-scale apparatus for simulation of temperature induced moisture migration in 290-kg blocks of Cheddar cheese.
Round-robin studies for fish mercury were also routinely initiated to ensure further reproducibility between mercury-sampling initiatives and to evaluate the performance of both laboratories.
Four studies used MSU crystal identification as the reference standard to evaluate the diagnostic performance of over 60 individual clinical, laboratory and imaging findings.
External proficiency testing programs designed to evaluate the performance of end-point laboratories involved in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials form an important part of clinical trial quality assurance.
We developed an external proficiency program for the IFN-γ ELISpot assay that evaluates laboratory performance based on five parameters: timeliness for data reporting; ability to handle cellular samples; detection of background (non-specific) responses; accuracy to consensus of the results; and precision of the measurements.
