evaluate on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evaluate on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "evaluate" followed by "for" or "based on." Example: "We need to evaluate the project based on its outcomes."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

Researchers do not have the resources or time to repeat others' experiments to test whether they are valid; and in many cases we rely on data coming from other fields – often data that we cannot easily evaluate on our own.

The Guardian

This study is the first one to evaluate, on a swine model, the systemic administration of an antioxidant molecule in the prevention of esophageal strictures.

Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair

According to Hsee [ 12] attributes that are difficult to evaluate on desirability have lower impact on preferences in separate evaluations than attributes that are easier to evaluate.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

For instance, they evaluate on a scale 1 to 5 for each of the evaluation items.

Pacific Journal of Mathematics for Industry

Meta-databases should help evaluate on to what extent the data records can be compared with one another for assessment.

Environmental Sciences Europe

"Because of the problem of cognitive overload, there is always a trade-off between comprehensiveness and realism on the one hand and the ability of subjects to comprehend and evaluate" on the other [[ 28] p152].

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

9 human-written examples

Because she enrolled in Weight Watchers Online, which includes a phone app to evaluate on-the-go food choices, she never attended weigh-in support meetings and flew under the company's radar.

The New York Times

In this paper, a simple fractional model is used to evaluate on-line the transistor junction temperature.

Advances in Difference Equations

Different ISO road classes are used to evaluate on-line the proposed road identification algorithm.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

This study provided a unique opportunity to evaluate on-the-job whole body vibration exposures in a standardized, controlled setting.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

This paper describes a process to evaluate on-farm irrigation efficiency across the watershed using a combination of remote sensing and ground level measurements.

Agricultural Water Management

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using evaluate, consider what aspect you want to evaluate. For example, instead of "evaluate on desirability" use "evaluate for desirability".

Common error

The preposition "on" is often incorrectly paired with "evaluate". It's more accurate to use "for" to specify what is being evaluated or "based on" to indicate the criteria used for evaluation. For example, prefer "evaluate for effectiveness" or "evaluate based on results" over "evaluate on results".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluate on" functions primarily as a verb phrase intended to describe the action of assessing something according to a specific criterion. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is not considered standard English. While examples exist, they often represent deviations from strict grammatical norms.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

36%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "evaluate on" appears in various sources, it's generally regarded as grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this assessment, recommending more precise alternatives like "evaluate based on" or "assess for" to ensure clarity and correctness. The phrase tends to appear in neutral contexts, spanning from news to scientific domains. Therefore, for formal or academic writing, it's advisable to opt for grammatically sound alternatives to maintain professionalism and accuracy. To better communicate the evaluation, consider replacing it with phrases such as ""judge based on"", "appraise in terms of" or "review with respect to" to better fit a formal context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluate based on

Emphasizes the criteria used for the evaluation.

assess based on

Suggests a structured and thorough evaluation process.

judge based on

Highlights the act of forming an opinion or making a decision based on certain factors.

examine for

Focuses on inspecting something to find specific qualities or issues.

analyze for

Suggests a detailed examination to understand the nature and elements of something.

determine based on

Emphasizes the process of finding something out definitively as a result of investigation.

appraise in terms of

Implies a formal assessment of value or quality related to specific aspects.

review with respect to

Suggests a formal examination with attention to particular details.

consider regarding

Indicates a more general act of taking something into account.

investigate with respect to

Emphasizes a systematic or formal inquiry to discover and examine the facts of an incident, allegation, etc. so as to establish the truth.

FAQs

What's the correct way to use "evaluate" in a sentence?

The verb "evaluate" typically requires a preposition like "for" or the phrase "based on" to connect it to the criteria or aspect being assessed. For instance, you might say, "Evaluate the project "evaluate for its impact"" or "Evaluate the candidate "evaluate based on experience"".

What can I say instead of "evaluate on"?

Alternatives include "evaluate based on", "assess "assess for"", or "judge "judge based on"". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "evaluate on"?

While you might find "evaluate on" used in some contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's safer to opt for alternatives like "evaluate based on" or ""assess for"".

How does "evaluate based on" differ from "assess for"?

"Evaluate based on" emphasizes the criteria used in the evaluation, whereas ""assess for"" focuses on the specific qualities or characteristics being examined. For example, "evaluate the plan based on its feasibility" vs. "assess the patient for symptoms".