Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Cardiac ultrasound: Studies to evaluate for pericardial effusion.
Although echocardiography is frequently used to evaluate for pericardial effusion and cardiac wall motion abnormality in the ED patient, echocardiography cannot exclude coronary disease, pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection as causes of chest pain.
Similar(58)
The FAST examination utilizes four specific locations to evaluate for intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, and pericardial fluid.
Describe the relevant anatomy to be identified with the FAST examination The FAST examination utilizes four specific locations to evaluate for intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, and pericardial fluid.
Each student is required to obtain multiple cardiac views (parasternal long axis, apical four-chamber, subcostal), to rule out pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade, to note heart size and global contractibility, and to evaluate for right ventricular strain as evidence of pulmonary embolism.
The cardiac ultrasound lecture covered evaluation for mitral stenosis, estimation of global left ventricular function and evaluation for pericardial effusion.
Relevant adult-specific literature One of the first uses of FOCUS was to evaluate the heart for pericardial effusion as part of the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination [115].
Data were evaluated for normality.
For the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, a combined approach is used to evaluate the morphologic pericardial abnormalities in conjunction with assessment of the functional and hemodynamic changes.
Since our initial study using intrapericardial P-colloid instillation as a treatment modality for pericardial effusion demonstrated a significant higher response rate, this study was conducted to further evaluate the efficacy of intrapericardial P-colloid in terms of response rates and duration of remissions.
We undertook a randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of pericardial sclerosis following drainage as compared with drainage alone.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com