The phrase "evaluate as true" is correct and commonly used in written English.
You can use the phrase in a sentence when you are asking someone to assess the truth of a statement. For example: "Please evaluate as true or false the following statement: The sky is green".
Example [2] demonstrates a clear declarative clause, in which the servant states a proposition which can be evaluated as true or false.
If we now associate the class of all such terms to the substitutional quantifiers $\Sigma \alpha$ and $\Pi \alpha$, then a sentence like $\Sigma \alpha \ \alpha = \alpha$ is evaluated as true in virtue of the truth of formulas like $0 = 0$, whereas $\Pi \alpha \ \alpha < \alpha$ is evaluated as false in virtue of falsity of formulas like $0 < 0$.
This all suggests, these realists argue, that moral claims might well carry motivational implications, and that might be the insight behind Moore's Open Question Argument, even though those claims express beliefs and, as a result, purport to report facts and can be evaluated as true or false.
Each Candidate is associated with one or more Arguments, logical expressions which if evaluated as true influence the recommendation of a Candidate.
In studies such as this, where an overwhelming proportion of the genome is evaluated as true negative in the confusion matrix, precision recall statistics can be a preferred option for genomic region prediction [ 57, 58].
For a given object a cedent can be evaluated as 1 (true) or 0 (false).
Thus, the number of FP could not be evaluated, as the true set of insertions present in these reads is unknown.
Strikingly, they evaluate affirmatives as true faster than as false, but evaluate negatives as false faster than as true.
We evaluate beliefs as true or false, memories as accurate or inaccurate, perceptions as veridical or illusory and so on.
