Dictionary
evaluable
adjective
Able to be evaluated in a certain way
Ai Feedback
The word "evaluable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used as an adjective to describe something that can be evaluated or judged. For example: "The results of the experiment are evaluable, so the team can now decide which hypothesis is correct."
Exact(19)
"E.P.A. has done a thorough job in evaluating all the evaluable data and found no cause for concern," he said.
So given that, the evaluable portion of Javelin's album-release show at Santos Party House on Thursday night began a couple of hours before the night's stars took the stage.
(In a company-financed study submitted to the F.D.A., the device missed two out of 127 evaluable melanomas.
You don't need a yardstick, for example, when deciding whether you're well-rested or exhausted, or hot or cold, because those states are "inherently evaluable" — they're easy to measure in absolute terms because we have sensitive biological mechanisms that respond when our bodies demand rest, or when the temperature rises far above or falls far below seventy-two degrees.
These normativities differ in two respects: first, social norms differ from one culture to the next whereas biological norms do not; second, unlike biological normativity, social normativity requires "the recognition by others that an agent is both responsive to and evaluable under a social norm" (Witt 2011a, 19).
That mental processes are computations, that computations are rule-governed sequences of semantically evaluable objects, and that the rules apply to the symbols in virtue of their content, are central tenets of mainstream cognitive science.
Similar(36)
Although the two views are not incompatible (Ayer denied that moral claims were assertions, and the redundancy of the truth-predicate held only for assertions) the tension between the two is symptomatic of the worry that moral claims have so many of the features of truth-evaluable assertions that one has to be unjustifiably revisionist in construing them as non-meaningful.
That is, it is not as though (1 - 3) each has fixed truth-evaluable contents, the truth values of which happen to depend on context.
Contrary to contextualism and Bach's theory, minimalism holds that lexicon and syntax together determine complete truth-evaluable propositions.
Borg believes that, in order to be truth-evaluable, propositional contents must be "about the world", and that this entails some form of semantic externalism.
It is clear that, if Swampman's inner states do have truth-evaluable contents, they cannot always have the same truth values as Davidson's.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com