The phrase "ethical relations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing interactions or connections that are guided by moral principles or standards.
Example: "The organization aims to foster ethical relations between its employees and the community."
Alternatives: "moral connections" or "principled interactions."
Every religious tradition has its own way of guiding and promoting ethical relations among its adherents.
In so doing, we illustrate complex and contradictory spatial, emotional and ethical relations between humans and non-humans.
It is an interdisciplinary area that considers the moral and ethical relations between human and non-human others (at all scales up to planetary).
The book can be overly didactic about the role myth plays in all human societies, but the taut prose propels the story and describes the process by which people "make a future by entering into ethical relations with the past".
The achievement of this book is to show that self-awareness is always incomplete, and that such incompleteness is not a failure but is crucial to sustaining ethical relations with others.
Ethical relations between groups did not and could not have emerged spontaneously in early human societies, as Darwin knew.
This is not an objection: let us not forget that Levinas does not seek to propose…moral rules, does not seek to determine a morality, but rather the essence of the ethical relation in general…in question, then, is an Ethics of Ethics [which]…can occasion neither a determined ethics nor determined laws without negating and forgetting itself" (p. 111; French, p. 164).
This is a primary form of justice which is an integral part of the ethical relation.
It is inconceivable to me that an ethical relation to land can exist without love, respect, and admiration for land, and a high regard for its value.
Kristeva sees in the ethics of psychoanalysis, premised on self-division, being strange to oneself, the possibility of establishing an ethical relation to alterity, inviting it into our political bonds (and warding off the most virulent forms of abjection).
If the infinite superiority is in reference to power or being, it is not obviously to the point; if it is an expression of an ethical relation, the argument is circular.
