Sentence examples for ethical propositions from inspiring English sources

In the case of ethics, the imprecision is related to the meaning of ethical propositions, and should reflect the degree of match between the denotative and connotative meanings of the same value, while uncertainty refers to the degree of belief we have in the truth of a certain proposition.

A sophisticated contemporary development of expressivism and projectivism, defended by the English philosopher Simon Blackburn and others under the title "quasi-realism," seeks to explain how one can properly treat ethical propositions as true or false without presupposing a special domain of nonnatural facts.

Russell held them back because he was not sure whether ethical propositions rose to the dignity of knowledge.

We have seen that Aristotle advised his pupils (and himself) also to construct lists of ethical propositions and problems.

The logical positivists demarcated more sharply the line between empirical language and normative language so that ethical propositions could not characteristically approach the status of an empirical science.

In IPML, Bentham directed this analysis against a host of ethical propositions he sought to eliminate as competing alternatives to the utility principle, such as "moral sense", "common sense", "law of reason", "natural justice", and "natural equity".

How effective a retention strategy is it, really, to treat Judaism as a tribe to be measured in numbers of surviving members, rather than as an ethical proposition born 3,000 years ago whose success should be gauged by its level of actual acceptance?

To be clear, there should be no apology for advancing an ethical proposition anchored in Christian theology.

I judged it necessary not simply to state an ethical proposition concerning climate change, but also to act on the proposition through practical policy initiatives whose effect could subsequently be measured.

The worst that can occur, in the post-Christian collective West, is for Christians active in the political process to publicly rely on either divine revelation or theological abstraction to argue an ethical proposition in the public square.

Translated into an ethical proposition, the principle reads: "Whenever there is at least one other person (person 2) who is willing to serve someone (person 1) who for whatever reason person 3 refuses to serve, then person 3 is ethically justified in refusing service to person 1; in other words, person 3 is ethically justified in committing an act of discrimination".