Table 11 Extension of avoidance of ethically problematical companies To what extent ought an ethical fund to avoid investing in ethically problematic companies?
Thus, according to Cullis et al. (1992), they can be called investment-investors. Table 10 Avoidance of ethically problematical companies Do you think that ethical funds should avoid investing in companies that you perceive to be ethically problematic?
We got the impression that colleagues who considered this experiment to be ethically problematic evaluated the information gained as less important than colleagues who accepted the ethical problem involved in this experiment.
Within the broader biomedical treatment and enhancement debate, several authors have convincingly argued that whereas drastic identity changes are problematic from an ethical perspective, typically requiring the discontinuation of the treatment or intervention, mild or moderate changes are not necessarily ethically problematic (e.g. [ 95]).
We then discuss ethical issues with respect to the ToMMo-BbP, and conclude that the project's design and implementation remain ethically problematic.
Approximately 94 % of the Swedish ethical investors, 79.6%% of the German SR and 88%% of the INT investors are of the opinion that SR funds should not invest in companies, which can be considered as ethically problematic.
Even though there are studies indicating various ethical challenges, the majority of the participants in the study of Lind et al. [ 8] did not feel that the use of coercion was ethically problematic.
Another area where Moore's ethical theory is problematic is his account of ethical knowledge.
One of the main reasons that the implementation of these ethical standards becomes problematic in the context of biobanking is that biobanking itself differs in substantive and important ways from the more traditional models of human subjects research that the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki were designed to govern.
However, this ethical framework is problematic because it does not address the moral, religious, or cultural concerns that donors may have about how their donations are used concerns we refer to as "non-welfare interests" (NWIs) (Tomlinson 2013; Tomlinson et al. 2014).
