Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(18)
Similar risk estimates were seen, regardless of BMI status, or gallstone status.
No differences in PM effect estimates were seen for degree of physical exercise, smoking status and hs-CRP.
Even higher estimates were seen for ever actively smoking women with at least two at-risk genotypes.
Many of our more striking increased risk estimates were seen for cancers other than these leading types.
Larger differences between cohort and period estimates were seen among cancers with better outcomes (10-year survival >50%).
Some of the largest and most significant effect estimates were seen for the models including PM10 and O3 among those children with respiratory infections.
Similar(42)
However, a large range of parameter estimates was seen even in the 30 most common species (e.g. 90% range for R40,j 2.54 to 5.63 m).
However, no pattern in the risk estimates was seen and all estimates were below unity.
No substantial change in parameter estimates was seen when substituting average values for missing data.
In our study, no difference in the risk estimates was seen by age.
The practical consequences of varying input parameters on the distribution of estimates are seen in Fig. 3.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com