Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
None of these estimates was significant, suggesting that any association is unlikely to be causal.
Statistical heterogeneity between study estimates was significant, probably due to variation in measured periods of prevalence and symptom measurement methods.
Nonetheless it is important to emphasise that none of these estimates was significant at a p value of <0.05.
For moderate activity, this effect seems to exist as well, but not so distinctively: only one of the four effect estimates was significant.
Levene's test confirmed there was homogeneity of variance and the t test revealed that this gender difference in mean estimates was significant; t (522)=4.27, p=<0.01.
Vitamin B6 was inversely associated with ESCC risk (P for trend: 0.01), but none of the individual RR estimates was significant.
Similar(52)
All parameter estimates were significant.
All estimates are significant at the <1% level.
Here we see all our test variable estimates are significant and with expected signs.
The estimates are significant in the extensive margin, indicating that training gaps increase in countries where EPL gaps are large.
The estimates are significant for three variables namely Bonding social capital (BOSC), Cognitive style (CS) And Gender.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com