Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
No consistent trend or impact on average meta-analysis estimates was noted when comparing pre-to-post vs. pre-to-follow-up measurements in studies where both sets of data were available (Additional file 13).
Similar(59)
Using daily meterological data spanning several decades from four selected locations in Australia, South Africa and USA, differences in ETo estimates were noted with and without the iteration method applied.
49 Similar estimates were noted in a follow-up study by the same author.
Any differences in estimates were noted and attributed to the effect of adjustment for waiting times.
No obvious changes in the estimates were noted, the only exception being the anatomy SRQs completed by the first cohort.
However, when NO2 levels where considered in the analysis no important changes in the relative risk estimates were noted, even for respiratory mortality.
The most dramatic adjustments in the unadjusted to adjusted point estimates were noted for staphylococcal foodborne disease, and for foodborne diseases caused by Vibrio vulnificus and other Vibrio spp., with an ≈80% change in point estimate for the latter.
Some associations were also found with times spent in certain coke ovens jobs with specific exposure scenarios, but results were not consistent across the two cohorts and limitations in the exposure estimates were noted.
While explicit survival estimates were noted in 50% of charts, physicians infrequently documented their own predictions of the patient's functional status (20%), anticipated need for chronic care (0%), or post ICU quality of life (3%).
The decline in the heritability estimate was noted in longitudinal studies by both van der Aa et al. [ 32] and Eriksson et al. [ 33].
In pooled subgroup analyses, all types of shift work were associated with an increased risk of coronary events, with the exception of evening shift work; the highest point estimate was noted for night shifts (risk ratio 1.41, 1.13 to 1.76) (extra table D).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com