Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Table 2 presents odd ratio estimates of prostate cancer risk for each genotype of estrogen receptor gene SNP.
The Cox proportional hazards regression models (Cox and Oakes, 1984), with time since measurement as time variable, were fitted to obtain RR estimates of prostate cancer for different groups.
Similar(58)
21 The study by De Stefani et al, 32 which was the only study that defined cases solely as advanced prostate cancer, had the highest risk estimate of prostate cancer, indicating that ALA may be strongly associated with disease progression rather than incidence.
Our estimates of monthly prostate cancer incidence may be imprecise due to reliance on population denominators that were only available annually.
A key strength of this paper is the use of routinely collected data from hospital episode statistics linked to cancer registry data, providing a large data set to make accurate estimates of relative prostate cancer mortality.
The value of the average length of stay in 2020 estimated using the linear model was less than 0.> The estimated COI of prostate cancer was 174.5 billion yen in 2002, 246.9 billion yen in 2005, 286.0 billion yen in 2008, and 307.3 billion yen in 2011.
The estimated risk of prostate cancer is 21%% and the lifetime risk of death is 2 5%%.
For example, prostate specific antigen (PSA) has long been used as a prognostic factor to estimate progression of prostate cancer.
In Europe, the estimated incidence of prostate cancer is 238,000 new cases with 85,000 deaths per year [ 1].
As both disease-associated BRCA2 mutation carriers were Caucasian, the prevalence of such mutations in whites is 0.78% (95%CI 0.09 2.81%); the estimated RR of prostate cancer is 7.8 (95%CI 1.8 9.4) in Caucasian BRCA2 mutation carriers.
We estimated incidence of prostate cancer by grade as defined by Gleason score: low grade (Gleason score ≤6), intermediate grade (Gleason score = 7), and high grade (Gleason score = 8, 9, or 10).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com