Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Are analysts' estimates likely to be more accurate this time around?
Similar(59)
The White House and many Democrats in Congress would prefer to calculate the surplus after accounting for anticipated and already-agreed-to spending increases, yielding a surplus estimate likely to be hundreds of billions of dollars less than either Republican version over the next decade, Democrats said.
This illustrates that mapping against distant genome references leads to a significant under-estimation of divergence estimates, likely due to the fact that most divergent reads are missed.
This means that one substantial inconsistency in the estimates is likely to influence the estimates of other migration flows.
However, not accounting for the at-risk population in the estimates is likely to lead to inaccurate estimates.
Hence, the population specific heterozygosity estimates are likely to be good estimators of genome-wide heterozygosity.
The estimates are likely to include both under- and over-estimates of the actual costs.
Luttwak's estimate of casualties was off by "many thousands," just as the current estimates are likely to be.
The trend, the report estimates, are likely to continue.
Experts say estimates are likely to be low because many victims never come forward.
The estimates are likely to rise as the melting snow reveals more and more cattle carcasses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com