Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Among the 20 patients for which the virus was estimated to evolve under a model incorporating positive selection, the BEB procedure identified 17 patients in which at least one codon had evolved under positive selection with a posterior probability >0.95.
Among the 18 patients in which the virus was estimated to evolve under a model incorporating positive selection, in 15 of them we identified at least one amino acid with a posterior probability >0.95 of having evolved under positive selection, and the number of such positions ranged between 1 (patient A09) and 9 (patient G16).
With the bootstrapped AR as a control, 9.4% of the 12mers are estimated to evolve under constraint.
We present the percentage of sites estimated to evolve under positive selection and the average dN/dS for those sites.
Indeed, mammalian nuclear-encoded mitochondrial ribosomal proteins have been estimated to evolve 13 times faster than the cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins in the same cell [ 76].
The S gene was estimated to evolve at mean rate of 6.72 × 10−3 substitutions/site/year (95% highest posterior density [HPD] 5.59−6.93 × 10−3 substitutions/site/year).
Similar(53)
Monogamy is estimated to have evolved in gibbons c.19 mya [ 76], with monogamous mating systems in primates evolving repeatedly from polygynous systems with a zero reverse rate detected in this study.
According to genetic studies, our earliest direct ancestors are estimated to have evolved around 195,000 years ago.
Extinction is actually a natural and common phenomenon – of the roughly 4 billion species estimated to have evolved on Earth, some 99% are gone.
Core cacti, those with strongly succulent stems, are estimated to have evolved around 25 million years ago.
Other similar published evolutionary rates of plant viruses are those for rice yellow mottle virus, which was estimated from samples collected over 40 years to be 4 8×10−4 ns/s/yr [14], and of tomato yellow leaf curl begomovirus estimated to be evolving at 4.6×10−4 ns/s/yr from samples collected over 18 years [15].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com