Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Speeds ranging from 600 to 780 m s−1 were achieved, and estimated strain rate of deformation is 107 s−107
The error between the estimated strain maps and measured strains is extracted to define damage detection features that are dependent on the selected shape functions.
The apparent maximum shear strain rate is defined as (ε 1 − ε 3)/2, where ε 1 and ε 3 are the maximum and minimum principal strain rates obtained from the estimated strain rate tensor, respectively.
A recent study estimated that there are ~8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between classical mouse inbred strains, which results in an estimated strain diversity of 1 SNP every 250-300 base pairs [ 15].
Therefore, the estimated strain was limited to the results obtained from the finite difference model, which showed better fit to the empirical model.
Sensitivity analysis indicates that an experimental error of 5% in the scratch hardness or the pile-up height induces an error of <22% in the estimated strain hardening exponent.
Similar(53)
The estimated strain-specific CDSs and core CDSs for the species, beyond the scope of eight sequenced strains if the genomes of additional strains were sequenced (i.e. n→ ∞), were extrapolated by fitting the data for the n = 1→8 comparison combinations above to an exponential decay functions as per [ 12].
A rarefaction curve plotted on the basis of the average number of CDSs per sequenced genome and the estimated strain-unique CDSs (for n = 2→8) shows that the extrapolated curve continues to increase with the addition of new sequenced genomes to the analysis.
In OCE, two methods have been proposed to estimate strain from the measured displacement map: FD strain estimation [ 3] and OLS strain estimation [ 20, 21].
This correlation was used to estimate strain rate values at extinction.
Therefore, a reliable method that can accurately estimate strain values in critical structural elements is necessary for damage identification.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com