Exact(6)
Estimated stature averages about 169 centimeters for males and about 160 centimeters for females, shorter than that of early modern humans.
The results showed no significant difference between true and estimated stature in both single and multiple regressions (Table 4).
For comparison, the mean of estimated stature was compared with the mean of true stature by paired T-test (Table 3).
The maximum difference between true and estimated stature in both single linear and multiple regression equations showed large differences i.e. 8.96 and 9.33 cm, respectively.
The left medial tibial length is ca. 340 mm; thus, an estimated stature of ca. 155 cm [ 17] can be assumed for a male individual.
H. naledi has a range of body mass similar to small-bodied modern human populations, and is similar in estimated stature to both small-bodied humans and the largest known australopiths.
Similar(54)
The science of estimating stature from bones was well known since the 19th century (Pearson 1899) till present moment.
The most precise results for estimating stature should be provided by the population, from which the equations were derived.
The aim of this study was to develop regression equations to estimate stature of Malaysian adults from radiographic measurements of upper limbs.
The shapes of feet and hands vary depending on races and gender, and it is of great importance to design an adequate equation in consideration of variances to estimate stature.
The mean estimated living stature for non-scorbutic males was 170 cm as opposed to 172 cm for scorbutic skeletons, and was statistically significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com