Sentence examples for estimated length for from inspiring English sources
A matched control set of 40,000 random sites was generated in silico on the human genome by discarding sites with the nearest Tsp509I, HpyChIV4, or HinP1 recognition site at <20 bp (the minimum requirement for a blast search) or >500 bp (the maximum estimated length for efficient 454 bead loading).
across throughout the thickness film, the estimated length for the grown titania nanopores results about 300 nm.
The only difficulty encountered in identifying blocks of conserved synteny in autosomes concerned the p arm of MEU2 (Additional File S2), for which only approximately 6 Mb (out of a total estimated length for 2p of 44 Mb) could be identified as being orthologous to human or opossum chromosomal segments (HSA11 or MDO5 and MDO8).
To estimate length for period of latent periodicity, a spectrum is introduced for another original statistics pl[see Equation (5)] called 'character preservation level at test-period'.
We excluded people with a record of care home use in the first three months of the data to ensure that we identified new entrants, and estimated length of stay for people admitted during the following twelve months.
This length accurately matches the estimated length increment for unfolding calculated from the crystal structure.
These findings may form the basis for a structured professional judgment instrument, rated prior to or at time of admission, to assist in estimating length of stay for forensic patients.
We think this evidence may form the basis for developing a new structured professional judgment instrument which could be rated prior to or at the time of admission in order to estimate length of stay for newly admitted forensic patients.
Over the whole range of observed shelter density, the estimated length increment was larger for primaries than for secondaries (Fig. 1).
Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate length of stay allowing for censoring [ 13].
We also estimated genome length for each family as the sum of map lengths multiplied by (m + 1)/(m − 1), where m is the number of markers per linkage group (Chakravarti et al. 1991).
