estimated for

USAGE SUMMARY

"estimated for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to an estimate of an amount of something, such as time or money. For example, "The project is estimated for completion in two months."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Allele frequencies were estimated for all loci.

International Congress Series

Time of injury estimated for subdivision analysis.

Annals of Intensive Care

Q values are estimated for other volcanoes.

Earth, Planets and Space

DT estimated for primary photons count losses.

EJNMMI Physics

Each disease׳s prevalence was estimated for the town׳s residents.

Respiratory Investigation

Operating costs were estimated for a full scale pilot.

Water Research

The quantizer parameters are estimated for each block.

Introduction to Data Compression

Bulk diffusion coefficients are estimated for several Cs impurity states.

Journal of Nuclear Materials

Highest values were estimated for the Duero Basin.

Tectonophysics

Effect sizes could be estimated for nine trials.

Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

Ks was estimated for a shallow subsurface ash-gray layer.

Geoderma

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "estimated for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being estimated and the basis for the estimation. Be specific about the parameters or factors considered in the estimation process.

Common error

Avoid using "estimated for" without clearly specifying what the estimation pertains to. For example, instead of saying "costs were estimated for", specify "project costs were estimated for better accuracy".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "estimated for" functions primarily as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that something has been evaluated or calculated, as shown by Ludwig. This implies that an assessment or quantification process has occurred, aligning with Ludwig's assessment that the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Formal & Business

3%

News & Media

2%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "estimated for" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase that serves to indicate that something has been approximated or calculated. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Its prevalence is highest in scientific contexts, as shown by the source analysis, where it communicates projections and evaluations. Related phrases include "approximated for" and "projected for", each with slightly different nuances. When using "estimated for", clarity and specificity are key to avoid vagueness. Despite its frequent use in formal and scientific contexts, ensure the subject of estimation is clear and precise for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

approximated for

Replaces "estimated" with a synonym indicating a less precise calculation.

calculated for

Suggests a more precise, mathematically-driven estimation.

forecasted for

Implies a prediction, often used in future contexts.

projected for

Similar to 'forecasted', emphasizing a projection into the future.

evaluated for

Indicates a judgment or assessment related to a specific purpose.

assessed for

Similar to "evaluated", implying a systematic appraisal.

determined for

Suggests a conclusive finding or decision.

predicted for

Focuses on foretelling a future outcome based on current data.

budgeted for

Implies a financial allocation or planning.

reckoned for

An older or more formal way to say calculated or estimated.

FAQs

How is "estimated for" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "estimated for" is used to indicate that a value or quantity has been approximated or calculated. For example, "The budget was estimated for the next fiscal year".

What are some alternatives to "estimated for"?

You can use alternatives such as "approximated for", "calculated for", or "projected for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "estimated at" instead of "estimated for"?

Yes, "estimated at" is also correct and often used interchangeably with "estimated for", though the best choice depends on the specific context. "Estimated at" usually refers to a specific value, while "estimated for" often refers to a purpose or time period.

What's the difference between "estimated for" and "predicted for"?

"Estimated for" generally refers to a calculation based on available data, while "predicted for" suggests a forecast of a future outcome. The former is more about current approximation, and the latter is about future anticipation.