Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
If ozone-related risk was estimated, did the study use alternate exposure metrics?
If PM-related risk was estimated, did the study summarize the particle composition?
We assumed the Ober and Maddison [ 28] 28S+wg maximum likelihood tree was the best phylogenetic hypothesis for harpalines available, but results from the BEAST analysis of all data combined where topology was also estimated, did not change our conclusions about the timing of harpaline origin or the rapidness of diversification of tribes.
Similar(53)
The risk estimates did, although not statistically significant, go in the opposite direction.
The effect estimates did not materially change when we did not adjust for urinary creatinine.
On average reliability estimates did not show major differences across time for mothers or fathers.
mlne and moments NeV estimates did not change appreciably from the previous temporal comparison.
Thus, the corresponding f estimates did not significantly differ from 0.5 (Fig. 2).
The point estimates do differ, however, suggesting that the sample was underpowered.
Uncertainty in our node estimates does not exclude earlier colonisation at 16.5 Mya.
As the GSEs grew, the estimates did too.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com