Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
3. Incidence estimate for study populations not included in the meta-analysis The 95% credible interval increases substantially due to the extra source of uncertainty involved: 0.31 [0.31; 0.31].
Figure 2 shows a Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for study patients.
For example (9) (c) Combining count and hazard ratio statistics in a network meta-analysis The log hazard ratio statistics from two arm trials comparing treatments k to b are incorporated in the network meta-analysis model using a normal likelihood: (10) where is the log hazard ratio estimate for study s comparing treatments k to b and is the corresponding variance.
Similar(57)
The estimate for study-defined subsyndromal delirium was half that of full syndromal delirium (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.41 to 7.73).The estimated age-specific period prevalence of the algorithmic diagnosis of delirium is given in Figure 2.
For clinician-reported outcome measures, the summary estimate for studies that used individual +/- group therapy was 1.70 (95 % CI 1.01, 2.40; z = 3.37, p = 0.0007).
This can be compared to the summary estimate for studies that used group therapy only which was 0.47 (95 % CI 0.08, 0.86; z = 2.36, p = 0.02).
Such trees can be used as a "best estimate" for studies of character evolution, especially when trees based on different analyses and data converge on the same estimate of evolutionary relationships.
However, in this study the opposite was found; a higher risk estimate for studies comparing alcohol-dependent subjects to the general population than for studies comparing alcohol-dependent subjects to cohorts without AUDs.
This was supported by the sensitivity analysis for severe asthma that showed a significantly higher pooled estimate for studies that did not adjust for confounders compared with those that did.
Incidence estimates for study populations not included in this meta-analysis.
None of the OR estimates for Study II reached statistical significance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com