Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(59)
Self-report is limited by recall bias which may over- or under-estimate consultation frequency.
The literature would suggest these patients are not having their symptomatic joint pain managed, but this may be due to limitations in the various methods of estimating consultation frequency and content.
Table 2 reports the distribution of the number of estimated consultations for tinnitus in the preceding three-month period.
We therefore conducted a study in a naturalistic GP-setting to estimate the consultation prevalence and describe symptom pattern of patients with persistent MUPS in Norwegian general practice.
The results showed that the constructed model could estimate GP consultation time for every area with >1,000 inhabitants in the Netherlands covering 97% of the total population.
The statistical model could estimate GP consultation time for every postcode area with >1,000 inhabitants in the Netherlands covering 97% of the total population.
In this study, we aimed to estimate the consultation prevalence of patients with persistent MUPS in general practice, including patients' characteristics and symptom pattern, employment status and use of social benefits, and the general practitioners' (GPs) management strategy.
Next, the coefficients from the multiple linear regression for the different predictors were multiplied by the number of these predictors in the area to estimate GP consultation time for all the postcode areas in the Netherlands (n = 4,033; Figure 2).
We adopted an exponential mathematical formula to estimate the consultation rate and the success rate in order to produce a feasible calculation in combining the normal distributions of SBP levels, considering that the consultation rate should get closer to 100% if SBP raises [ 26].
Others were estimated after consultation with cardiologists in practice in 1981.
One of the general methodological limitations of the studies included relates to estimates of consultation frequency.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com