Exact(6)
Pink Esthetic Score (PES).
The outcome measures include the measurement of the labial soft tissue thickness and the implant esthetic score system (IES).
Soft tissues at augmented sites were 1.3 mm thicker than on control sites and had a better pink esthetic score.
The pink esthetic score (PES) was used for the evaluation of reproducible soft tissue around the final implant crown as a parameter for the aesthetic outcome [12].
Implant survival, the width and thickness of peri-implant keratinized gingiva, probing depth, bleeding on probing (BOP), the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), peri-implant bone loss, and the presence of peri-implant osteolysis were determined.
Investigation parameters: Implant being in situ Width and thickness of peri-implant keratinized gingiva Pink Esthetic Score (PES) Probing depth BOP Peri-implant bone loss Presence of peri-implant osteolysis.
Similar(2)
There was no significant difference in esthetic scores between the male and female participants in either age group.
Pithon et al. [11] found no significant difference between black space esthetic scores in groups 15 19 and 35 44 years old.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com