Statistical results on data conducted after individual subtraction of the baseline value during the 1-min period before stimulation onset did not differ essentially from those conducted using baseline value as an additional level of the Time factor.
In a recent study by Zhu et al. [24], conducted using an essentially identical secondary detector, the ratio of SE and BSE was found to be in the range of 85%to90%0% (SE) to 15%to10%0% (BSE) at 200 kV.
Quantification of mtDNA was conducted using a rt-qPCR method essentially as described [24].
The results of the efficacy analyses conducted using the ITI set were essentially identical to those using the PP set; differing by only 0.1% for each of the VMCCI, CCI, and LCI endpoints (data not shown).
Our sensitivity analyses showed that results remain essentially unchanged when analysis of beverage intake was conducted using cohort wide categories of intake instead of country specific categories (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 6).
The study was conducted using lab mice.
Both were conducted using automated phone calls.
All analyses were conducted using MetaWin [30].
Statistical analysis was conducted using SigmaStat 3.5.
Analyses were conducted using Statistica 6.0 (StatSoft).
