Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(3)
Where essential information was missing, authors were contacted personally.
We excluded studies if they failed to meet the inclusion criteria or essential information was missing and could not be obtained from the authors.
1,176 of these (90.7%) could be entered into the evaluation-database; the remaining 120 (9.3%) were excluded because essential information was missing on the handwritten consultations (e.g. drug strength or dosage regimen).
Similar(57)
We show not only that the magnitude of the task is daunting, but also that the efforts so far have been disappointing and that essential information is missing.
For instance, recent studies showed that for 15% of patients essential clinical information was missing at the point when decisions were being made, and that essential equipment was missing or faulty in 19% of operations.
When information was missing on essential variables we contacted authors for further information.
Information was missing for 6% of children.
7% of social class information was missing.
Information was missing for the remaining 21.7%.
Therefore, some demographic information was missing.
Information was missing in one child.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com