Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
Errors were scored using a 3-level grading scheme depending on their potential harm or impact on patient care.
Amount recalled in the correct serial order and sequencing errors were scored.
SRM errors were scored as before.
The scores were compared and discrepancies that were not clerical errors were scored as questionable.
Errors were scored each time the subject entered the arm not containing the platform.
In all trials, the latency of reaching the exit and the number of errors were scored.
Similar(48)
Working memory errors are scored in this task as revisits to "incorrect" holes which subjects have already investigated within a probe trial.
A cross validation error was scored if a previously mapped SNP and a GBS tag disagreed on parent of origin.
Each trial lasted 1 min and an error was scored each time when the body of the mouse, excluding tail, entered the wrong arm, entered the arm with the platform but did not climb on it, or did not make a choice for 15 sec.
Risk of error was scored 1 3, where 3 expressed high risk: being certain that a wrong answer was correct.
First error was scored as the number of holes away from the correct hole first approached by the mouse.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com