Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(50)
Spot checks suggest a much larger number of errors, up to one-third.
Most, however, simply chalked the errors up to the ambitious pace of Mr. Ambrose's late career as a blockbuster author.
(A covariance of 0.16 results in orientation errors up to 0.8 or 45).
In contrast, the Princeton model yields relative errors up to e= 41.5%.
This method has shown to be inaccurate [1] with residual translation and angulation errors up to 10 mm and 25°.
We can see that the proposed method in this article is robust to large coregistration errors (up to 1 pixel).
Similar(10)
The coarse controller generated a following error up to ±100 μrad at 10 Hz.
Within experimental error up to two periods of such oscillations were observed.
This technique obtained the most reliable age estimates, with an error up to 3.5%.
It exhibits built-in flux equilibration and is equivalent to the energy error up to data oscillation, under suitable assumptions.
The model shows that the variation of soft tissue compressibility introduces an error up to 5% in blood pressure measurements.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com