errors to start

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "errors to start" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to mistakes made at the beginning of a process or task, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "There were several errors to start the project, which caused delays in the timeline."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The Rangers made three consecutive errors to start the bottom half, with Martin reaching on a fielding error by Elvis Andrus to start it off.

The Guardian - Sport

The case of the imam, Kadir Gunduz, 48, has upset not only Muslim leaders, but also people of other faiths who say immigration officials have taken a hard line on visa applications for religious workers since the Sept. 11 attacks and look for small errors to start deportation proceedings.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

7.45pm BST Evans 1-2 Tomic* Tomic error to start but he forces the issue afterwards and levels it up.

The Guardian - Sport

But it is no error to start a meal with some of his heavier offerings as well.

The New York Times - Food

The courts "created corporations as persons," she said, and "there could be an argument made that that was the Court's error to start with".

The Economist

The Vermonter proclaimed that it was a tactical error to start the health care process by stressing the need for legislation to get 60 votes.

Huffington Post

Pafko reached on an error to start off the bottom of the fifth, but was caught stealing second base; Gil Hodges and Branca both struck out to end the fifth.

Wikipedia

Lowe retired Jeter, Gary Sheffield and Rodriguez to escape the inning with a 1-0 lead, but Garciaparra's error seemed to start a trend.

The New York Times - Sports

(Jacky) It is nice to have a limited set of pronunciation error types to start with.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

7.52pm BST Evans 1-4 Twoic* Two errors from Evans to start a key game in the set, but he wins the next point.

The Guardian - Sport

The only exception is reachability for PFS and CB-PFS, where the errors are small to start with.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to mistakes made at the start of a project or task, consider using clearer and more grammatically standard phrases like "initial errors" or "errors at the beginning". This enhances clarity and avoids potential misinterpretations.

Common error

Using the phrase "errors to start" can sound awkward or unclear. Instead, opt for more precise phrasing like "initial mistakes" or "early errors" to ensure your meaning is immediately understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "errors to start" functions as a noun phrase, seemingly intended to describe mistakes occurring at an initial stage. However, it's not a standard or commonly accepted grammatical construction. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase isn't considered correct and lacks clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "errors to start" appears in various sources, it is not considered standard English and lacks grammatical clarity. Ludwig AI flags the phrase as incorrect, advising users to seek clearer and more accepted alternatives such as "initial errors" or "errors at the beginning". Although examples exist in news, science and wiki contexts, its usage is rare and should be avoided in formal or professional settings to prevent ambiguity. Opting for more precise phrasing will improve clarity and ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

initial errors

Focuses on the timing of the errors, specifying that they happen at the beginning. It's more concise and grammatically sound.

beginning errors

Similar to "initial errors", it emphasizes the temporal aspect of the mistakes, highlighting that they occur at the start.

errors at the start

Rephrases the original by using a prepositional phrase to indicate the timing of the errors.

mistakes at the outset

Uses the word "mistakes" instead of "errors" and "outset" to denote the beginning, providing a slightly more formal tone.

early mistakes

Emphasizes the timing of the mistakes, indicating that they happened early on in the process.

mistakes in the beginning

Rephrases the original by using a prepositional phrase and the word "mistakes", offering a slightly different phrasing.

problems at the commencement

Uses more formal synonyms for "errors" and "start", resulting in a more elevated and sophisticated expression.

initial setbacks

Shifts the focus from errors to the resulting setbacks or difficulties experienced at the beginning.

flaws to begin with

Replaces 'errors' with 'flaws', suggesting inherent imperfections from the beginning.

starting errors

Inverts the order, it's a more direct way to express the mistakes happening at the start.

FAQs

What does "errors to start" mean?

The phrase "errors to start" isn't standard English, but it seems to refer to mistakes or errors that occur at the beginning of a process or activity. It's generally better to use clearer alternatives.

How can I rephrase "errors to start" to make it sound more natural?

Consider using alternatives like "initial errors", "errors at the beginning", or "early mistakes" to express the same idea more effectively.

Is "errors to start" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "errors to start" is not considered grammatically standard. It's better to use more common and accepted phrases for improved clarity.

What are some formal alternatives to "errors to start"?

In formal contexts, you might use phrases like "initial setbacks" or "problems at the commencement" to convey a similar meaning with a more polished tone.