Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
Biologists attribute them to inattention, but design proponents say the errors show that Darwinists are more than willing to accept shoddy evidence if it supports evolution.
The investigations concentrating on mechanism errors and actuator errors show that the mechanism errors have more influences on the position-stance of the moving platform.
The modeling identified statistical characteristics of the pseudorange and more, in the case that the SA was off the pseudorange errors show a stationary-like behavior.
Those errors show up as checkerboarding, which are those blocks you see when video goes bad, as well as other visual goofs the trade lumps under the heading artifacts.
Three examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of this technique, and the structural errors show significant improvement in all examples, compared to the conventional three precision-point solution.
The results, in the case with errorless measurements as well as with measurements containing random errors, show good agreement between evaluated and exact parameter values and confirm the validity of the proposed method.
Similar(26)
All errors shown are 1σ.
Reversible Errors shows where Turow's interests lie.
Twice, counting errors showed Mr. Pataki taking the lead, only to be corrected a few minutes later.
Clustered standard errors shown in parenthesis.
Errors shown are the mean±s.d.d
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com