Sentence examples for errors or ambiguities from inspiring English sources

Experience in the CAESAR project has shown that structural databases in the literature often contain errors or ambiguities so a thorough cross checking of chemical structures was carried out by two or more partner institutions.

Small sequencing errors or ambiguities can potentially have an important impact on identification success under both character-based and phenetic methods.

Also, some of these data may contain errors or ambiguities as they only rarely – if at all – undergo independent data quality review [2].

It appears that curation errors or ambiguities may be a more significant source of wrongly inferred associations than our main assumption that a bait with several preys in a single publication represents a single unit.

In a pharmacovigilance setting for biologic products subject to biosimilar competition, an opportunity to enable accurate attribution of an AE to a specific product may include assignment of multiple or redundant product identifiers to promote resilience of attribution in the event of errors or ambiguity in any one identifier.

Any error or ambiguity and incompleteness were corrected before the individual was told the test result in his/her visit for the post test counseling.

By simultaneously estimating multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic footprinting predictions, BigFoot correctly incorporates alignment uncertainty information into functional element predictions, and ensures that alignment error or ambiguity will not prevent the software from identifying slowly evolving regions.

Second, identity resolution needs to handle not only duplicates caused by entry errors or data ambiguities but also intentional identity fraud and deception, which tend to be hidden and concealed.

So while I talk more, explain more, inquire if there is ambiguity, maybe I can explain already before we start, how the process might go, or any possible errors or possible ambiguities, or I ask if the trainee has seen something like this before or not.

So we went through the manuscript and made changes, speaking of "robustness to translation errors" or, where no ambiguity is perceived, simply, of "robustness".

Did it contain an error or an ambiguity that I could not see?