Suggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Couling wrote: "Our wider review of the evidence suggests a limited number of other locations where errors of this type were also made".
Therefore, we first identify and screen out errors of this type and then apply the correlation test.
Record review did not identify any errors of this type.
Errors of this type are communicated back to the authors of the source ontology.
Errors of this type are noted where observed but the reassembling of these merged contigs throughout the genome was considered to be beyond the scope of this work.
Furthermore, wrong coded diagnoses within the same Charlson category were considered confirmed, as errors of this type would not affect the Charlson comorbidity index score.
Similar(51)
Considering previous reports with 22.7% erroneous patient groupings due to faulty paper-based ventilation time documentation [ 3] the use of the PDMS has likely eliminated a majority of potential errors for this type of data.
From the point of view of empirically measuring kon and koff values the differences in these assigned values (e.g. ~2.5 fold between 1.5 or 4.0 x 10 M-1 s-1) are small and within the margin of error for this type of analysis.
"Steps have been taken to prevent an error of this type from recurring.
The result of each error of this type is either an inflation of the calculated exposure or a buttressing of Silbergeld's stated opinion.
Further analyses with pure heterozygous samples, such as control cell lines, could be useful to calculate the standard error of this type of measurement for future experiments.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com