Sentence examples for errors of table from inspiring English sources

It is found that, the motion errors are mainly affected by the geometric errors of guide rails rather than the geometric errors of table.

Hence, the averaged errors of Table 1, and the accuracy and precision metrics of Table 2 are distorted by the model outputs identified from the measurement sets recorded directly before death in pigs 1 and 2. Figure 3 Comparison of the modeled to measured left ventricular pressure waveform, volume waveform, and pressure-volume loops for pig 4 at 30, 120, and 210 minutes into the trial.

These estimates differ by more than those for ⟨ν⟩∞, perhaps because additional approximations have gone into the derivation of the relevant equations (in addition, we have made no attempt to carry out the rather complex propagation of the sampling errors of Table 2).

The error on the calculated value is reduced by 50%% by increasing p from 10to25%5 % after the propagation of the error of Table 2. Results for all dies are shown in Additional files 9 and 10.

Although comparing variance components and thus heritabilities is fraught with issues because of high standard errors, examination of Table 3 shows that the proportion of variation accounted for by the additive genomic relationship matrix is low relative to the entry-mean broad-sense heritability in most cases.

The main error components of the machine tool are the spindle errors, motion errors of working table (linear motion axes) and vibration errors, respectively.

In addition to the means and standard errors of overyielding, Table 1 presents conservative correction factors that may be used to estimate mixed stand productivity based on the productivity of neighbouring monocultures of the constituent species.

Compared to the ADHD groups controls showed less motor activity, a shorter RT with less variability and more errors of omission (table 3).

The prediction error (RMS error of prediction, Table 2) ranged between 1.75 and 3.5 times the modeled water-level fitting error (RMS error of fit, Table 2).

While the linear displacement error of the table is quite low (4.5 μm), straightness, yaw and pitch errors on the other hand were significantly higher and may contribute from 20 to 30 microns of form and orientation tolerances over a large size build.

The cross-classification showed a significant agreement (weighted Kappa 0.704 with standard error of 0.038) (Table  2).