Sentence examples for errors of reasoning from inspiring English sources

In the first, he and Tversky did a series of ingenious experiments that revealed twenty or so "cognitive biases" -- unconscious errors of reasoning that distort our judgment of the world.

Even then, the courts will overturn decisions only because of errors of reasoning or procedure: they may not rule on the technical details of each case.More friction, less forcePerhaps the root of the divide between EU and America policy is not in philosophy or legal systems but in history and market structure.

The fallacies listed by Mill are errors of reasoning in a comprehensive model that includes both deduction and induction.

The evident error of reasoning here is that goal-directedness is very hardly preserved in spatio-temporal scale transitions.

A paralogism is "the type of fallacy in which an error of reasoning is typically committed by failing to meet some necessary requirement of an argumentation scheme" whereas "the sophism type of fallacy is a sophistical tactic used to try to unfairly get the best of a speech partner in an exchange of arguments" (2010, 171; see also 1995, 254).

"In particular, superstitious thinking springs from misunderstandings of probability and random processes, errors of logical reasoning, and cognitive short cuts that sacrifice accuracy".

Locke clearly thought that the three ad arguments were inferior to ad judicium arguments, but he never used the term 'fallacy' in connection with them, although he did use it in connection with errors of syllogistic reasoning.

All these considerations are generally concerned with minimizing various "errors" in making causal claims: error of representation, error in logic of reasoning or in the implied mechanism that underlie the causal relationship, error in estimating differences or relationships, error in extrapolation.

(1) The classical heuristics-and-biases program [15] assumes that people use heuristics to deal with the limitations of the cognitive system, leading to systematic errors and lapses of reasoning that point to human irrationality.

It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning.

But even this key premise is fallacious, as it relies on a notorious error of probabilistic reasoning known in law as the "Prosecutor's Fallacy" [ 82, 83].