Suggestions(1)
Exact(14)
Cutting errors, number of re-cuts, complications, and mean surgical times were recorded.
Scores were based on number of trials administered, total number of correct responses, number of errors, number of perseverative responses, number of perseverative errors, number of non-perseverative errors, number of categories completed, number of trials to complete the first category, conceptual level responses, failure to maintain set, and learning to learn.
The categories number of trials administered, total number of correct answers, total number of errors, number of perseverative responses, number of perseverative errors, number of categories completed, number of trials to complete the first category, and failure to maintain set were considered for analyzing gains related to cognitive flexibility in the present study.
A deciding set seemed likely when the Czech moved to 5-2 aceace, only for Murray to battle his way into contention and seal victory thanks to errors number 63 and 64 from the Berdych racquet. .
In addition, this method records learners' misconceptions, errors, number and types of mistakes made by the learner, learner failure and success, and time taken to complete the game (Virvou et al. 2003; Champagnat et al. 2010; Virvou et al. 2002; Rebolledo-Mendez et al. 2008; Cheng et al. 2009; Fareed et al. 2010; Khenissi et al. 2013a).
The WCST main indicators were the number of correct responses, total errors, number of continuous reaction, perseverative errors, and the number of completed categories.
Similar(46)
By the fourth set, Gambill's backhand broke down and his unforced errors, numbering 51 to Corretja's 27, piled up.
Rookie error number 50.
Depending on the type of data, various statistical algorithms are used to generate statistics, such as mean, standard error, number of data points, and error bounds.
That's error number one then, isn't it?
In this learning test paradigm, an average error number of less than one by trial 4 (T4) or T5 is regarded as secured memory formation or recall, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com