Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Figure 5 The estimation errors in Figures 4(b), 4(d), and 4(f) are shown in (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Correction to: Blood Cancer Journal (2011) 1, e46; doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.46; published online 2 December 2011 Since the publication of their article, the authors have identified errors in Figures 2 and 5 owing to errors in figures assembly.
In the original paper, there were a number of errors in Figures 4 and 7. Here, we provide the right form of these figures.
Editor's Note: The Advance Publication of this article contained errors in Figures 2, 3, and 4. Numeric city-specific hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were for a 5-μg/m increase in PM2.5, whereas the plotted values were for a 1-μg/m increase as indicated in the figure legends.
Similar(55)
The RMS values of the phase errors in Figure 9 are summarized in Table 1.
Similarly, we compare the localization errors in Figure 10 with a range of R values.
The results are shown, through the running average errors, in Figure 15.
For clarity, we mark the poor estimations with red stars and plot the detailed estimation errors in Figure 9b.
For comparisons sake a read with 2 SNPs and one color space errors would be equivalent to 4 color errors in Figure 4A.
The probability errors in Figure 1 and Figure 2 were measured using the Matlab "Anova" function.
The same tendency is shown in the prediction errors in Figure 6.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com