Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
The RMS values of the phase errors in Figure 9 are summarized in Table 1.
Similarly, we compare the localization errors in Figure 10 with a range of R values.
The results are shown, through the running average errors, in Figure 15.
For clarity, we mark the poor estimations with red stars and plot the detailed estimation errors in Figure 9b.
As excepted, the fitted residual densities are close to the assumed NSD errors in Figure 2, and all of them still show a truncated distribution feature.
A simulated video frame for this situation is shown in Figure 22 (right) and the resulting errors in Figure 23 (bottom).
Similar(34)
Correction to: Blood Cancer Journal (2011) 1, e46; doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.46; published online 2 December 2011 Since the publication of their article, the authors have identified errors in Figures 2 and 5 owing to errors in figures assembly.
In the original paper, there were a number of errors in Figures 4 and 7. Here, we provide the right form of these figures.
The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 2, wherein the bottom right western blot panel in Figure 2a was blank.
The originally published article contained an error in Figure 2a: for the left side of the figure part (showing piRNA-directed DNA methylation of mouse transposable elements), DNMT3A/B should have been DNMT3C.
This performance improvement becomes evident when looking at the plot of the mean absolute error in Figure 17.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com