Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Errors are noted and alerts are sent to tablets posted at the end of aisles, which workers check at the beginning of their shift to see if anything has gone missing.
When compared to the "exact" model that incorporates nonlinear slabs, the two-way grid beam model produces acceptable results when comparing axial forces under gravity loads, however the errors in peak displacements range from 10to25%5 % (in the region of the missing column lines) and even larger errors are noted in predicting shear forces in the beams.
These kinds of errors are noted by Harismendy et al. [11] and in more detail by Kircher et al. [13].
Similar(57)
The possibility for errors is noted briefly in the document but it adds: "Sampling in this phase [phase 1 training set] will be repeated until assumptions and distributions are met".
"Errors" were noted when reported values deviated more than 1000% from reconstructed values and also excluded from the accuracy analyses.
The number of errors was noted at each trial, errors being defined as a visit to a non-baited arm or a repeated visit.
Only a few errors were noted and these were corrected before coding.
The two databases were compared and no consistent errors were noted.
Minor typographical errors were noted throughout; however, they did not detract from the overall presentation.
In the dIVC <18% group, two qualitative evaluation errors were noted for quantitative dIVCs of between 0 and 10%.
After enrichment, similar errors were noted in eight genomic DNA PCR products and six cDNA PCR products.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com