Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
Three sources of classification error were considered; spatial mis-registration, ice depth variation, and talik presence.
When reaction times and movement error were considered, more interesting results appeared.
Different types of prediction error were considered, such as excluding coding exons, including introns as part of the coding sequence, or wrongly predicting start and termination sites.
Values of p ≤ 0.05 (α error) were considered statistically significant.
Various forms of cancer registration error were considered as part of the simulation.
Only clusters with p < 0.05 corrected for family-wise error were considered significant.
Similar(51)
Nor should doctors' expert testimony, which is subject to error, be considered decisive.
Therefore, this error is considered to be.
Overall, the method error was considered negligible.
Could a newspaper typographical error be considered a faux pas?
The new measurement fits with previous estimates when their margin of error is considered, he says.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com