Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The performance of the resulting confidence bounds in accurately representing model error was evaluated using both visual inspection for specific events, and rank histograms and range statistics for the simulated model error quantiles.
The interobserver variability was studied using 2 of the authors (BÖ and AR) and the intraobserver error was evaluated using 1 author (BÖ).
Similar(58)
For each k-th part, a model is trained on the other K - 1 (training) and a prediction error is evaluated using the fitted model to predict the outcome on the k-th part (test).
Non-negative variable ξ i is introduced to describe the quantity of the violation and to modify the inequalities to which can be summarized to The total error is evaluated using the sum of the mean violation of positives, as and the mean violation of negatives, as.
Three methods for controlling Type I errors are evaluated using simulated data for factor analytic models: the standard approach which involves testing each parameter at the.05 level, a Bonferroni approach, and a simultaneous test procedure (STP).
Therefore, when refractive errors are evaluated using VEPs or VEFs, it is important to note that temporally overlapping cortical sources may affect the results obtained and that stimulus parameters such as luminance and spatial frequency are crucial for determining the relative contribution of each cortical activity.
Post-error slowing, or the increase in reaction time after an error, relative to corrects, was evaluated using a one-factor (trial type: post-error vs. post-correct) repeated-measures ANOVA.
The equipment's precision error expressed as CV was evaluated using a spine phantom and was less than 1%.
The precision of the estimators was evaluated using standard error and relative standard error.
The effect of thickness measurement uncertainty on volume uncertainty was evaluated using the error of a single measurement to estimate the error of the whole population of measurements and therefore volume.
The statistical significance of differences in statistical reporting and errors between the four journals was evaluated using chi-square test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com