Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
An error was counted if a subject failed to raise his/her thumb.
An error was counted if an animal entered an arm previously visited or did not eat the reward.
The overall rate of errors in our study was 8%, but as only one error was counted per script, the actual true number of errors may have been greater.
In practice, considering the real and the imputed genotypes, 0 error was counted if both genotypes were identical, 1 if the real genotype was homozygous and the imputed genotype heterozygous (or vice versa) and 2 if the real and imputed genotypes were both homozygous but different.
Similar(56)
The number of errors was counted in each interpretation and subsequent verification with either the checklist or analytic prompt.
For optimization of the pairwise alignment parameters, the total number of errors was counted in a test dataset of 500 kb for a series of gap opening and gap extension penalties.
For the trials in which X was neither A nor B, errors were counted for the pair consisting of X and the A or B stimulus that X was incorrectly perceived as.
(Note that the denominator here is the sum of the matching lengths of contigs rather than the number of finished bases covered, and that all errors in the contigs are counted. For example, if two contigs cover a given finished base, and both get the base wrong, then both errors are counted).
Factual errors were counted as well.
The errors are counted as discordances with the observed genotype at sites that SLRP imputes fully.
Once a rat made 2 or fewer incorrect choice during a block, all subsequent perseverative errors were counted as regressive errors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com