Sentence examples for error varies from from inspiring English sources

b F. oxysporum; n = 3 and standard error varies from 0.004 to 0.04.

For the three individual countries, the margin of error varies from ±3.18 to ±4.22%%.

It can be observed easily from Table 2 that the relative percentage error varies from 0%to3% 3 % which is reasonably less.

Open image in new window Fig. 7 Effect of using different concentrations of Ag NPs synthesized by A. cepa extract (pH 12, 40 °C, 48 h) on growth of a E. coli, B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa; n = 3 and standard error varies from 0.002 to 0.02.

Margins of error varied from 2.6percentt (Australia) to 4.38percentt (Israel).

The margins of error varied, from as low as plus or minus two percentage points to as much as plus or minus four percentage points.

The mean relative error varied from 2·0 to 8·3% for six predictions with an average of 4·4%.

The root mean square error varied from 7.42 to 9.77 in moving average method, while in case of kriging it varied from 7.33 to 9.99 indicating similar performance of the two techniques.

For the cephalometric variables, the random error varied from 0.21° (SNA angle) to 0.32° (gonial angle) for angular measurements and from 0.16 mm (Co-Gn) to 0.24 mm (overbite) for linear measurements.

The mean biomass density and attached standard error varied from 3.28 ± 0.31 to 204.92 ± 57.69 Mg ha−1 across the LUCas (Fig. 5; Table 6) with the lowest biomass density in cropland and the highest biomass density in plantations emphasizing the potential of plantations as a mitigation strategy for the climate change.

For D = 0.3 mm, theoretical estimation error varied from 0.2%to11%1%.