Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
To reduce interpersonal data interpretation error, this test was performed by single operator.
Similar(59)
We can see that the simple two-tap filter provides the lowest RMS delay error in this test case.
12 13 The typical error for this test in our hands is 1.8%.
Although control mice made very few working memory errors during this test, GluA1−/− mice made a significantly greater number of errors.
By controlling for measurement error, this method tested the assumption of whether the frailty measure is uni-dimensional or not.
The type 1 error associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.
The results of the Tajima test are therefore potentially compounded by the effect of a recent "population" expansion of these segments, which is known to inflate the type-I error rate of this test [ 23].
For example, how to calculate the critical value for testing the selected treatment against the control at the final stage, whether it is possible to control the type I error rate of this test in the strong sense; finding multistage designs (e.g., the K and L in the three stage context) that are optimal in terms of maximal power and minimal size.
The type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.
The type 1 error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.
The type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 5%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com