Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(24)
Since it is these hard-to-prove claims that Mackie and other error theorists need to make their argument work, we should hesitate before jumping on board.
Thus far the hermeneutic fictionalist agrees with error theorists.
Error theorists also can find no special comfort in minimalism about truth and fact.
Non-cognitivists agree with error theorists that there are no moral properties or moral facts.
There are, to be sure, error theorists who happily embrace this conclusion.
Noncognitivists and error theorists alike have no trouble respecting naturalism while offering their respective accounts of moral claims.
Similar(36)
Mackie thought of himself as an "error theorist" — because, in his view, anytime we make a moral judgment that purports to be objectively true we are inevitably wrong — but there are other skeptical ways of responding to the fact of ethnocentrism.
The error theorist pressing this form of argument thus faces two kinds of opponent.
The error theorist must be prepared to defend herself on both fronts.
The error theorist is typically characterized as holding that all atomic moral sentences are false.
The moral error theorist stands to morality as the atheist stands to religion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com