Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The estimated sampling error of this study was ±2.5%, with a 95% confidence interval [10].
Also, the multiplicity was not adjusted to control the type I error of this study.
Similar(58)
The factual errors of this study caused Filitti great distress, to the point where he planned to entirely revise his version of the Cantacuzino family tree.
This element of over-control may once again increase the chance of a type 2 error for this study.
This refers to the systematic error of the study and is related to study design, variables and analysis strategy.
The refractive error of the study subjects ranged from -12.12 D to +7.25 D (mean SE = +0.39±2.38 D).
In reality, random errors are unlikely to occur at a fixed rate and the introduction of set levels of error in this study was done to simplify the modelling process, with no attempt being made to represent systematic failures (which may have been possible by simulating age heaping or more random degrees of misreporting).
Despite the mentioned sources of error, this study has shown dual inclinometry to be a reliable tool for measuring lumbar flexion and extension.
Landmark identification was another potential source of error in this study.
Scott observed that the Clarke Error Grid allowed what seemed to be unacceptable degrees of error in this study.
It was considered ethically justifiable that it would not be possible to identify persons with high risk of error from this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com