Exact(1)
7 Inconsistency between the direct and indirect comparisons may be explained by the play of chance, bias in the direct or indirect comparison, and clinically meaningful heterogeneity. 3 The funnel plot in this study shows that the effect of random error is apparent; the points of inconsistency (ratio of odds ratios) with less precise estimates were much more widely scattered (fig 3).
Similar(59)
The second systematic error was apparent when comparing recalled texts sent over different periods (figure 3).
Bland-Altman plots revealed a reasonable agreement between FRAX and QFracture at lower fracture risk scores, but for those patients with a higher fracture risk, a systematic error was apparent with QFracture consistently giving lower risk estimates than FRAX (mean difference 2.68) (figure 2A).
A concentration of errors is apparent around the edge boundaries of objects in the SI frame.
The general effect is acceptable for toga and sword but some minor registration errors are apparent for the galea model in the case of a single user.
Thus, while errors are apparent, the large number of annotations generated and their general high quality suggests that the method can be used as it is.
Irrational drug therapy with prescribing errors was apparent in primary care practice, which may be related to a lack of drug information, pharmacovigilance programme, and nonadherence to basic principle of prescribing.
In line with findings of an investigation conducted in Northern Ireland [ 7], the present study reveals no statistically significant improvement in overall prescribing safety as a result of routine inpatient treatment even though a large potential for error reduction is apparent throughout the care continuum.
In light of the highly undesired outcomes of incorrect DSB repair, the need for mechanisms to regulate the second and error-prone phase is apparent.
The local error is visually apparent from obviously duplicated buildings for FS 2.0 based on LIDAR in Fig. 10 and for FS 1.0 based on LIDAR in Fig. 9. Furthermore, FS 1.0 based on GPS had a low local accuracy in Areas 1 and 2. The error in Area 1 was 0.31 m (Fig. 9) and that in Area 2 was 0.57 m (Fig. 10).
A significant proportional error is also apparent, with higher average values significantly correlated with a larger positive bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com