We tested the overall effect of the experimental stage on the mean percent error in Trials 2 8 of the 10 critical sessions of each performance test.
We used the head repositioning accuracy (HRA) test to evaluate neck position senses of neck flexion, neck extension, neck right and left side flexion, and neck right and left rotation and calculated the root mean square error in trials for each subject.
Using simulations, we investigate the effect of 2%, 5% and 10% random and non-random crossovers prior to radiotherapy initiation on the ITT, PP, AT and the combination of ITT and PP analyses with respect to type I error in trials with time-to-event outcomes.
Post hoc comparison with Bonferroni correction showed that only the spatial errors in trial 4 and trial 7 were significantly different (p <.05).
The Stroop test was scored by measuring the time needed for the color naming trial II subtracted from the color-word interference trial III (Stroop effect) and by counting the errors in trial III.
However, this is also a limitation, as studies of naturally occurring OA in dogs are associated with factors that may be confounding, such as the presence of concurrent medical conditions, variations in the home environment of each dog, and the potential for owner errors in trial compliance.
Participant P7 made two errors in trials that evaluated rejection control of the FE and BA relationships.
Participants from the Keyboard condition (P4 and P5), in turn, made more errors in trials that evaluated selection control.
Participants from the Mouse condition (P7 and P9), for example, made more errors in trials that evaluated rejection control.
When the memorized stimulus is small, subjects tend to make more errors in trials in which the probe stimulus is larger than the memorized stimulus, compared to trials in which the probe is smaller than the memorized stimulus.
