Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
To assess the performance characteristics of genomic classification to systematic error from normal contamination, we collected 55 tumor samples and paired tumor-adjacent normal tissue.
Similar(59)
When (n) becomes larger, the error-ratio for NY and LA increases noticeably, as shown in Fig. 7a, b, which is different from the error-ratios observed from normal.
We propose two methods for automatic tightening of reconstruction error from only the normal activities for better identification of unseen falls.
The phenotypic value was then generated by adding a random error from a standard normal distribution to the genotypic value.
The normalized error of distance estimate from normal node i to anchor j is calculated by ε ij = | d ̂ ij − d ij | / d max for i ∈ Ω N, j ∈ Ω A. Note that d ̂ ij ≠ 0. The normalized localization error of normal node i with distance estimates to at least three anchors is γ i = ∥ p ̂ i − p i ∥ / d max.
This approximates to the normal level of between-replicate variability expected using the Sequenom EpiTYPER approach [ 9] and suggests that the accurate pooling of DNA prior to sodium bisulfite treatment does not introduce any significant error beyond that resulting from normal technical variability.
Another way of dealing with SEM standard errors from non-normal data is bootstrapping, already included in several statistical packages with SEM module.
Data are mean ± standard error of mean, astatistically different from normal, bstatistically different from sepsis.
The phenotypic value for each individual was obtained by adding to the genotypic values an independent error from a zero-centered normal distribution with a certain variance so that the heritability of the trait was 1/2.
Somatic errors can only accumulate within stem cells because non-stem cells and their errors are lost within days from normal crypt cell differentiation and migration [ 4, 5].
Adjusted mean MFI and standard error of mean levels of p63 and VDR from normal skin samples, BCC samples, SCC samples and precursor to SCC samples were plotted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com