Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
While this scheme may well result in some improvement in word recognition with boosting, while avoiding relying on potentially erroneous phonetic labels, there is some information that is not utilised.
The erroneous S.& P.
This is totally erroneous.
His conclusions are erroneous.
But they are also erroneous.
This was erroneous.
It happens to be erroneous.
Interferences cause erroneous analytical results.
His arguments are erroneous and sloppy.
No boost.
Ms. Oaks' allegations are unfounded and erroneous.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com