Exact(3)
Similar potential quantisation errors in the normalised areas are calculated as: Err(1) = (100 * (0.5 * Peak1Max)) these are output in the left-right diagonal of the quantisation errors matrix.
Lemma 6 (v, v err, 1) is a node-occurrence of a model m' = mα, if, and only if: 1. Match: (father v, v err, 0) is a node-occurrence of m and label(E v))[1] = α.
The.632+ method is described by the following formula: E r r 0.632 ′ = E r r 0.632 + (E r r 1 − e r r ) (.368 ⋅.632 ⋅ R ′ ) 1 −.368 ⋅ R ′ where Err (.632'), Err (.632), Err (1) and err are errors estimated by the.632+ method, the original.632 method, leave-one-out bootstrap method and err represents the error.
Similar(57)
So it's official, men are, err, 0.23 stars funnier than women.
In Table 2, it is easy to see that the fourth column err ( 0.5, h ) h 2 is monotone decreasing along with the space step's waning.
Although histological studies have identified a relatively high incidence of apical ERR, 2D radiographic studies have been less definitive [4],[5] and have in general proven inaccurate for the reliable detection of small ERR defects [6].
Also we noticed that there are some other ranking performance evaluations like ERR [41], MAP [42] etc., while they are not intuitionistic as NDCG does.
In Table 3, it is easy to see that the fourth column err ( 0.5, h, Δ t ) h 3 + Δ t tends to a positive constant.
It is easy to see that the third column err ( 0.1, Δ t ) ( Δ t ) 2 of Table 1 is monotone decreasing along with the time step's waning, the third column err ( 0.1, Δ t 0 ) N − 2 of Table 2 is monotone decreasing along with N's magnifying.
In Table 1, it is easy to see that the third column err ( 0.5, Δ t ) Δ t is monotone decreasing along with the time step's waning and the fourth column err ( 0.5, Δ t ) ( Δ t ) 2 is not monotone decreasing along with the time step's waning.
Table 4 records the invariant quantities together with errors err ∞, err 0 computed on the finest space-time grid and compares obtained results with several previously presented schemes given in [6, 7, 20] and [5].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com