Sentence examples for erp measures from inspiring English sources

Retrieval suppression was examined with the think/no-think task (TNT) using behavioral and event related potential (ERP) measures.

We examine ERP measures of error-related negativity (ERN/Ne) and error positivity (Pe), as well as event-related fMRI measures locked to False Alarms.

We find that achieving stable estimates of ERP measures required four to six error trials and approximately 30 participants; fMRI measures required six to eight trials and approximately 40 participants.

We compared behavioral and ERP measures associated with performing a Go/NoGo response-inhibition task under conditions where participants (N = 18) sat in a stationary way, walked deliberately or walked briskly.

While the absence of lexical decision priming has already been demonstrated in this design it seems premature to draw any definite conclusions from this purely behavioral result since event related potential (ERP) measures have been shown to be a more sensitive index of semantic activation.

To assess effects of motor load on cognition we evaluated young (N = 17; mean age = 27.2) and older adults (N = 16; mean age = 63.9) and compared behavioral and ERP measures associated with performing a Go/No-Go response inhibition task as participants sat stationary or walked on a treadmill.

Event-related potentials (ERP) measured by scalp EEG and MEG have shown that the visual system classifies a stimulus category rapidly within around 100 msec based on the visual characteristics of the input [35], [36].

Given the paucity of available research on ER with ERPs, measures of attention control and efficiency may be the most prudent outcomes to begin researching developmentally, since the ERP findings of mindfulness training in adults allow for more-confident predictions that is, a more negative N2 (Moore et al., 2012) and less P300 positivity (Slagter et al., 2007).

For sleep stage 2, significant clusters in response to the rare tones are shown in Figure 1B and Table 2, along with the grand average ERPs measured at the Cz derivation.

Pilot studies indicated no system-related differences in ERPs measured and a subsequent repeated-measures ANOVA, with responses to D1 as the within-subjects measure, and System as the between-subjects measure, indicated no system-related differences in responses [F 1, 57) = 0.870, p = 0.102].

Consequently, if we had to do with an epiphenomenon, we should have observed gender differences on P300 on parietal and occipital regions as well, whereas we reported gender differences during early ERPs measured mainly in anterior areas.